Link roundup for October 2017
This month’s link round-up begins with a big tutorial on making posters by Desi Quintans, “How I make conference posters.”
Excerpt:
This lengthy piece covers some material that’s familiar to regular readers, but provides it in a convenient one-stop shop. It’s this month’s “must read!”
Nichloas Rowe has authored Academic & Scientific Poster Presentation: A Modern Comprehensive Guide for Springer. I may have a longer review later, but wanted to bring this to people’s attention now.
Earyn McGee also has a thread on Twitter that describes her lessons as an early poster presenter, presenting at the SACNAS 2017 conference. Hat tip to Toby.
Dan Quintana also provides helpful advice, but it’s more concise.
That’s the whole thing.
An academic poster in a cartoon style.
Hat tip to Rainer Melzer.
Kayla Brandi makes a cape of her poster.
Hat tip to Juan Ruiz and Auriel Fournier.
Amber Dance has a nice feature in Nature on what makes for a good conference. The take aways are that you need to create “hallway conversation,” have a diverse group of people, and pick a good location.
Up for discussion in the PeerJ preprint server by Foster and colleagues is a discussion paper on “Good Practice for Conference Abstracts and Presentations.” Here’s what they say about posters:
Hat tip to Jackie Marhington and PeerJ.
Mice, as depicted in scientific journals:
This collection, curated by Neuroskeptic, is a good opportunity to think about the choices behind each figure. No two are the same. Which ones work, and which ones don’t?
Jared Spool said:
Hat tip to Julie Dirksen.
Men ask more questions than women in conference sessions. I wonder if this holds true in poster sessions, too? Hat tip to Amy Hinsley and Joshua Drew.
When competing for attention, playing against expectations can be powerful:
Hat tip to Jason and Asia Murphy.
Kimm Hannula has a little Twitter thread about how conferences can create “social capital.”
About my design ethos
I think that visual design is just as important as content. I believe that by adapting lessons from other fields of publishing, we can design posters that are unconventional and surprising, and yet attractive to look at and informative to read. The alternative is to be cursed with posters that all look the same.
This lengthy piece covers some material that’s familiar to regular readers, but provides it in a convenient one-stop shop. It’s this month’s “must read!”
•••••
Nichloas Rowe has authored Academic & Scientific Poster Presentation: A Modern Comprehensive Guide for Springer. I may have a longer review later, but wanted to bring this to people’s attention now.
•••••
Earyn McGee also has a thread on Twitter that describes her lessons as an early poster presenter, presenting at the SACNAS 2017 conference. Hat tip to Toby.
•••••
Dan Quintana also provides helpful advice, but it’s more concise.
That’s the whole thing.
•••••
An academic poster in a cartoon style.
Hat tip to Rainer Melzer.
•••••
Kayla Brandi makes a cape of her poster.
Hat tip to Juan Ruiz and Auriel Fournier.
•••••
Amber Dance has a nice feature in Nature on what makes for a good conference. The take aways are that you need to create “hallway conversation,” have a diverse group of people, and pick a good location.
•••••
Up for discussion in the PeerJ preprint server by Foster and colleagues is a discussion paper on “Good Practice for Conference Abstracts and Presentations.” Here’s what they say about posters:
3.2 Posters
3.2.1 While it is technically possible to make posters permanently available (e.g. on conference websites or platforms such as F1000 Research), some journals regard this as prior publication so it may prevent full publication. Authors should therefore check the policies of their target journal(s) before agreeing to a poster being publicly posted.
3.2.2 Posters are not peer-reviewed by conferences and may not describe all aspects of the research . Posters should therefore not be viewed as a substitute for a full article in a peer-reviewed journal. However, if a poster is publicly available (and, ideally, searchable via an indexing system or DOI ) it may be cited until the full publication is available (although some journals consider citation of posters as unpublished information rather than full citations).
3.2.3 The lead author (e.g. principal investigator) should be given the first option to attend the poster session(s) but this role may be taken by other authors or a local presenter (if the authors do not speak the language of the conference). The poster presenter should be agreed before the abstract is submitted.
Hat tip to Jackie Marhington and PeerJ.
•••••
Mice, as depicted in scientific journals:
This collection, curated by Neuroskeptic, is a good opportunity to think about the choices behind each figure. No two are the same. Which ones work, and which ones don’t?
•••••
Jared Spool said:
“Great designers do not fall in love with their solution. Great designers fall in love with the problem.”
Hat tip to Julie Dirksen.
•••••
Men ask more questions than women in conference sessions. I wonder if this holds true in poster sessions, too? Hat tip to Amy Hinsley and Joshua Drew.
•••••
When competing for attention, playing against expectations can be powerful:
Hat tip to Jason and Asia Murphy.
•••••
Kimm Hannula has a little Twitter thread about how conferences can create “social capital.”
Comments
Post a Comment